Supernova Remnant 1E 0102.2–7219

This Hubble Space Telescope portrait reveals the gaseous remains of a took off massive star that emerged approximately 1,700 years earlier. The stellar remains, a supernova residue named 1E 0102.2-7219, fulfilled its death in the Small Magellanic Cloud, a satellite galaxy of our Galaxy. Credit: NASA, ESA, and J. Banovetz and D. Milisavljevic (Purdue University)

Astronomers are winding back the clock on the broadening remains of a close-by, took off star. By utilizing NASA‘s Hubble Area Telescope, they retraced the quick shrapnel from the blast to determine a more precise estimate of the location and time of the excellent detonation.

The victim is a star that exploded long back in the Little Magellanic Cloud, a satellite galaxy to our Milky Method The doomed star left behind an expanding, gaseous remains, a supernova residue called 1E 0102.2-7219, which NASA’s Einstein Observatory initially found in X-rays.

The research study group, led by John Banovetz and Danny Milisavljevic of Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, determined the speeds of 45 tadpole-shaped, oxygen-rich clumps of ejecta flung by the supernova blast. Ionized oxygen is an excellent tracer because it shines brightest in noticeable light.

To calculate an accurate explosion age, the astronomers selected the 22 fastest moving ejecta clumps, or knots.

According to their quote, light from the blast got to Earth 1,700 years back, throughout the decrease of the Roman Empire. The supernova would only have actually been visible to residents of Earth’s southern hemisphere. There are no known records of this titanic occasion.

The scientists’ results vary from previous observations of the supernova’s blast website and age. Earlier research studies, for example, arrived at surge ages of 2,000 and 1,000 years back. Banovetz and Milisavljevic say their analysis is more robust.


This time-lapse video shows the movement of a supernova remnant– the gaseous remains of a took off star– that appeared approximately 1,700 years earlier. The outstanding corpse, a supernova residue named 1E 0102.2-7219, fulfilled its demise in the Small Magellanic Cloud, a satellite galaxy of our Galaxy. The motion picture’s opening frame shows ribbons of glowing gaseous clumps that comprise the remnant. The video then toggles in between two black-and-white images of the residue, taken 10 years apart, revealing subtle shifts in the ejecta’s expansion gradually. Credit: NASA, ESA, A. Pagan (STScI), J. Banovetz and D. Milisavljevic (Purdue University)

” A previous study compared images taken years apart with two various cams on Hubble, the Wide Field Planetary Electronic Camera 2 and the Advanced Video Camera for Surveys (AIR CONDITIONING),” Milisavljevic said. “But our research study compares information taken with the exact same camera, the ACS, making the comparison far more robust; the knots were a lot easier to track utilizing the same instrument. It’s a testament to the longevity of Hubble that we could do such a clean comparison of images taken 10 years apart.”

The ACS data exposed regions where the ejecta slowed down because it was slamming into denser material shed by the star before it blew up as a supernova. They required the ejecta that best shown their original speeds from the explosion, utilizing them to figure out a precise age quote of the supernova blast.

Hubble likewise clocked the speed of a believed neutron star— the crushed core of the doomed star– that was ejected from the blast. Based upon their estimates, the neutron star must be moving at more than 2 million miles per hour from the center of the surge to have reached its current position. The believed neutron star was determined in observations with the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope in Chile, in mix with data from NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory.

” That is pretty fast and at the severe end of how quick we think a neutron star can be moving, even if it got a kick from the supernova explosion,” Banovetz said. “More current investigations call into question whether the things is actually the surviving neutron star of the supernova explosion. It is potentially just a compact clump of supernova ejecta that has actually been lit up, and our outcomes typically support this conclusion.”

So the hunt might still be on for the neutron star. “Our research study doesn’t resolve the secret, but it provides a quote of the speed for the prospect neutron star,” Banovetz said.

Banovetz provided the team’s findings on January 14, 2021, at the American Astronomical Society’s winter season meeting.

The Hubble Space Telescope is a project of worldwide cooperation in between NASA and ESA (European Area Agency). STScI is run for NASA by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy in Washington, D.C.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here